Mathematics Education Essays
words for mathematics instructor
fairness and inductive principles for instruction
apprentice viewpoint of arts trades and disciplines
education an empirical art
Prequel In For A Penny In For A Pound
Leaner mathematics curriculum
need for a mixed mathematics curriculum
Motivation and Context Problem
How to be a better instructor
Four ways to improve education reform
cultivating intelligence
three kinds of reason in mathematics
Different Kinds of Reasoning in maths
Education in mathematics science and technology
mathematics instruction in general
Theory of Knowledge
formal or informal peer review
Operational Viewpoint to Value
standards for course material
three aims for mathematics students
02 20 mathematics education references
02 21 words for teachers
04 25 when to stop or suspend mathemat
04 29 New Mathematics Curriculum
05 13 OldSiteEntrancePage
three goals for Mathematics Education
the trouble with algebra
Lessening Algebra Difficulties
teaching tutoring algebraic reason
geometric implications for algebra
mathematics curriculum shifts
What to Tell Students
teaching tips
three difficulties
talk the algebra talk
Secondary One Mathematics
Secondary Two Mathematics
Secondary Three Mathematics
how letters appear
Maps-Plans-Drawings
five decades make a difference
Education Reform Inconsistencies
Postscript 2007 01 10
mathematics in context
what should be learnt and When
grouping students according to ability
learning takes time
modern education
teacher certification
Mathematics Education Professors
key notes and themes
About site lesson plans
site eurekas
site origins
links Education Resources online
activities for students
Applied Maths Program14092009 POMME variant
Math Ed if it must be short make it lean effective
permissions for teachers
Teach the teachers plus goals
three goals to set for students
website reviews
which way to go
why bother
Welcome to the mathematics education revisited (essays, rants and
proposals) site section. In the past essays and rants used to be spread
though out site sections. Now they are all located in this site
area. Section material represent reflections and reactions to what has
been done in the past. When I first heard of constructivism in the
1990s, I read its then and revised principles and standards (NCTM
emitted) to see what proposed in the hope of supporting local trends with
a few methods (lessons that had worked) because I did not have an
academic position, and prospect for one were dim. Instead I found
myself in a counter-trend position with ends and values for mathematics
education strikingly different from dominant position and more closely
aligned what is called the mathematically correct. At the
same time, constructivist calls to engage students, to provide rich
learning problems and environments and to empower students through such
environments had a strong appeal. They represented an ideal to
strive.
My exploration and expression of ideas and methods for
instruction stemmed from an observation of steps too large or gaps and
eventually inconsistencies in skill and concept course design that the
constructivist movement inherited from earlier efforts. I had some
remedies which I felt compelled to explore and report. While the
latter was motivated by the difficulties of my students 1983-89 while I
taught in college posts, the remedies posted online 199502010 are too
late for past students, but may be timely for their grand-children. That
is another case of better late than never.
That being said, the constructivist principles or
standard that true knowledge is a private affair, located in the mind,
apart from reliable observation and testing, and not to be challenged
because everyone's ideas and reflection should be respected, appears to
be in contradiction with the old-fashion ends and values that called
for observable skill development in a tangible or observable
manner. Each of us in a daily lives from cooking to driving has
and follow skills or routines to obtain repeatable and reproducible
results. In that, there is an element of rote learning. In rules and
practices are given and followed carefully (we hope) to avoid mistakes.
Performance, know-how, observable skill development, does not require
comprehension. They may be learnt by rote. For material ends and
subjects in education, some practices may be learnt and combined by
rote. But there may be intelligence or observable skill in learning to
how apply implications, rules and practices carefully (avoid mistakes)
and in mastering the further super-practice of how to combine
implications, rules and practices to obtain more, all in an observable
and recorded manner for peer- or self-correction.
The site two level framework POMME for Progressive (meaning
step by step) or Practical Observable Motivated
Mathematics Education is based on teachers and students being given or
offered clear ends, values and methods for skill development via
small and alternative step likely to work and likely to ease or avoid
common fears and difficulties. The focus of instruction is on
credible and reliable skill development. True skill development has
to been seen and reliable to be credible. And this student
confidence and self-esteem comes learning to do. The rich learning
environment and problems currently sought to support constructivist may
also lead to projects and paths that enrich and motivate observable and
verifiable know-how development. POMME tangible ends and values
provide a context and motivation for its methods, while it methods
support the ends and values. In that, awareness of the domino
effect of approximations and errors in figuring and reasoning may be both
a method and also an end and value for instruction. So ends, values and
methods for instruction may overlap.
Before the advent of POMME, many ideas were explored in formative
essays. The essay still include reflections yet to be included in the
implementation of POMME. Just for the record, this site has existed
for a three to four years or not more.
Mathematics Education Rants and Essays
Section Content.
About this Site
|
About POMME: In mathematics education, the
question of which way to go is answered here by a statement and
balance of ends, values and methods in a two level framework POMME
for Progressive (meaning step by step) or
Practical Observable Motivated
Mathematics Education. The first level for the
education serves common needs of life in the streets, or at home or
at work, in many societies - developing to de-industrializing. The
first level focuses on student centered skill
development. The core of the second level represents
preparation for college programs in scientific
fields.
The second level core is subject centered in that
students learn skills and concepts that may have intellectual
value, but more importantly to society, prepares some not all for
work in mathematical arts and disciplines - engineering,
technology, business and money matters, and/or mathematics
education itself.
The second level core is not inclusive where
observable student performance in mathematics and other disciplines
is employed for student selection by college programs. That
selection may be described positively via talk of competitive
spirit and giving the most able a chance to continue in the few
space available in higher education. It may be described negatively
as giving preference to some, not all, in terms of
opportunity.A similar question of competition versus
inclusion is met in the question of whether or not athletic
activities are for competition or general health.
The first level aim to develop know-how and
work habits with take-home value as long as that development
remains simple. We may may also say the role of the second level
is provide the less simple know-how with take-home value, and do
that as early as possible for the sake of student centered
instruction. That may offset content concerns, that is the
mathematical demands of further instruction and/or competition
for places there-in. While I prefer inclusion (helping as
many as possible) to competition (selecting the few), I dislike
more the existing state of secondary mathematics in which topics
and skill development are not explicitly connected to common
needs (even if they be years or decades later) nor explicitly to
the needs of college programs in scientific and other fields. The
ends and values of the two level framework may not be optimal,
but if that is all we have to offer, they should be stated
clearly and strongly. That being said, students gain
self-esteem or confidence by being shown what to do in an
observable ways, ways chosen to aid skill development and not to
distract from it. The confidence and self-esteem that may
follow from learning to do (see site methods to make learning to
do simpler and richer) may compensate where the ends and values
of instruction are not perfect.
Besides ends and values, POMME or site material
includes content innovations and different starting points for
skill and know-how development. Those starting or entry points are
chosen to facilitate, optimize and not impede the development of
skills and practices, those appearing in daily life and those
appearing in scientific fields. Different starting points and
starter lessons, all motivated by explanations of common content
difficulties apart from context, make quantitative skills and
know-how development richer and easier for learning and teaching.
POMME and site material stands on and reacts to earlier paths for
course design, on their strengths and weaknesses. Where the initial
aim in writing was to address a few initial concern or content
gaps, over time writing drifted to a more daring and bold endeavor
of providing not only more and more different pathways for skill
development, but also to provide context. Without that,
mathematics skill development year after year, no matter how
refined or polished, serves no ends and values.
|
-
Site History and
Content - through site reviews 1995 onward.
-
Site Eurekas - Site Highlights,
an old view
-
Site Origins
-
About Site Lesson
Plans - Another tour of Site Content
Lesson Plans, Aims and Goals (Ends, Values and Means?)
-
Three Aims
for Students - Ends and Values
-
Three Goals
for Mathematics Education, etc - Ends, Values, Unifying Themes
-
Lessening or
Avoiding Algebra Difficulties
-
Algebra Lesson
Plans
-
Algebra,
Geometrically
-
Mathematics
Curriculum Shifts
-
Advice and Suggestions for
Course Design and Delivery
-
Teaching Tips - from fractions
to Calculus
-
Math Education Perils
(Arithmetic, Algebra, Calculus)
-
Talk the algebra talk
-
First Year High
School Math - Lesson Plans with Fraction Focus
-
Second Year High
School Math - Lesson Plans with an algebra focus
-
Third Year High
School Math - Lesson Plans with a Focus on Slopes
-
How Letters Appear in
Mathematics
-
Map, Plans and Drawings, a
multi-year project
Links
-
Links -
Just a few.
-
Activities to Engage
Students - links to explore
Ideas and Principles For Instruction and Educational Reform
-
Inductive Principles For
Instruction - systematic skill and concept development.
-
Fairness
in Education - requires systematic development of all skills and
concepts.
Can education be fair if students are tested on natural
talents instead of developed ones? Mastery of a skill, say
the algebraic way of writing and reasoning, is regarded as a natural
talent when and only when we do not know how to systematically
develop that skill or concept. Site material reduces the number of
natural talents required in the mastery of mathematics. Find
the four skills for algebra in chapters 8 to 14 of Volume 2,
Three Skills for
Algebra, to see how to develop the
algebraic way of writing and reasoning, and thus make mathematics
fairer.
-
Apprenticeship in art, trades and disciplines, a classical view.
-
Education is an
Empirical Art
-
Key Notes and Themes
-
For a Leaner
Mathematics Curriculum
-
Need for
a Mixed Mathematics Curricula
-
Extent and
Need for Quantitative Skills depends on your society
-
Ways to be a Better
Instructor - Ideas and Methods - try with caution
-
Four Ways
to Improve Education Reform, and avoid disaster.
Logic and Reason in Mathematics
Mixing Rote & Thought-Based
Development
-
Cultivating
Intelligence - Why value careful mastery of rules and patterns,
steps and methods, practices, in a repeatable and reproducible manner.
-
Multiply
Kinds of Reason in mathematics - Essay I
-
Multiply
Kinds of Reason in Mathematic- Essay IIs - On the hierarchical
development of rules and patterns, steps and methods, and practices in
pure and applied mathematics (mixed mathematics). What is proof? What
options are there for a thought-based development and verification of
college and pre-college mathematics?
-
Theory of Knowledge -
Stories, Longer and longer
-
Formal or Informal
Peer Review
-
Education
in Mathematics, Science and Technology - All based on empirical
verification and empirical skill development and verification. But in
mathematics we can offer a full thought-based development while in
science and technology, we can introduce the scientific method and
introduce lab equipment, but can only provide a full-thought based
development through visits to the lab and library. The lab alone is
insufficient.
-
Maths
Instruction in General - Three Goals A B and C to Set for Student,
Supporting those goals and why rewrite the curriculum
-
Operational
Viewpoint - Aim for an Operational Command of Mathematics First.-
For students with no immediate interest in the know-why, a focus on the
practice, an operational command of key skills and concepts may make
comprehension later of the know-why easier and more appealing. The
calculus teacher may says to students - learn to do now and to
understand later.
-
How to Set
Standards for textbooks and course materials - Need for
Inspection by University Domain experts outside of Education Faculties
to ensure bureaucratic course design and textbook composition does not
lead to nonsense in mathematics education.
Teacher Training
-
Teacher Certification
Issues and Cautions
-
Math Ed.
Professors - Mathematics Background of, Trust but verify - see transcripts. Knowledge should be
above or beyond calculus. If that is not the case, explain why not.
Archives:
-
About this site - old version
-
Old Site Entrance -
2010-05-1
-
Yet Another Old Site Entrance
-
Maths Ed
Stopping Rule - 2010-04-25
-
A New
Mathematics Curriculum - 2010-04-29
Challenges for Education Reform
-
Five Decades make a
difference
-
Managing Reform - Assigning
Responsibilities. (Should anyone be responsible? Should anyone be
in charge? Is reform headless?)
-
Mathematics in Context
- What Context?
-
What
Should be Learnt and When?
-
Grouping
Students - Streaming?
-
Learning Takes Time and
Effort
-
Making the Hard Easier but
Ignoring how and so missing the Point
-
Hook, Line and
Sinker - Mathematics Education Inconsistencies - Reform in
North America
-
More on Mathematics
Education: Covers: For a leaner curriculum, Education an
empirical art, More on testing, Constructivism versus Empirical
Methods.
-
Four Skeptical
Essays on Constructivism Revisited - Incompleteness
-
Euclidean Model
for Development. Damage Reversal
-
Educational Follies -
Learning By Discovery incomplete, cannot work, compound difficulties.
-
An Educational
Inconsistency.
-
Modern Education
But teaching by indirect instruction requires not only a knowledge of
what can be taught directly, but also a knowledge of how to explain all
elements indirectly. Anything less invites or compound difficulties.
Ouch.
|
|