|
YOU are better than YOU think. Show yourself how:
|
-/[]\- Logic chapters 1 to 5 re- appear not in sequence, as is or longer, in Volume 1A, Pattern Based Reason, Bon Appetite. Logic
Mastery Logic mastery makes the hard, easier. Logic mastery leads to better, stronger and richer comprehension. Logic mastery improves reading and writing. Logic mastery ease learning difficulties. Logic mastery gives a headstart. In sum, logic mastery will develops critical thinking, improve reading and writing, and give a firmer base for work and studies at many levels. Good luck. After logic, (a) continue reading Three Skills for Algebra, chapters 8 to 14 and do so alongside site area on solving liinear Equations ; or (b) see this calculus starter lesson and Volume 3, Why Slopes & More Math, chapters 2 to 6;
|
-/[]\- What may be learnt and when depends on how skills and concepts are developed. Making the hard easier and clearer will allow earlier & richer development of skills and concepts. Try the Twiddla
Whiteboard. In principle, it allows
to people to draw and chat together online on a copy of this webpage or a clean
sheet. The chat may be via text or audio. Visit www.twiddla.com
to set up whiteboards to work with the webpage of your choice. |
Fractions in a Nutshell
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 5 |
means or equals | 4 times | 1 5 |
of an object |
In symbols or shorthand notation (with a * meaning times)
| 4 5 |
= | 4 * | 1 5 |
Here
| 1 5 |
is unit fraction. All fractions are multiples of simple fractions
| Another Example: | 3 4 |
= | 3 * | 1 4 |
Think of a unit fraction like a third
1
3
as unit for counting not whole objects, but parts of them. With that viewpoint, can count 2 thirds, 4 thirds and 8 thirds of an object. We also have
2 thirds + 5 thirds = 8 thirds.
or in fraction notation
| 2 3 |
+ | 5 3 |
= | 8 3 |
Whole numbers like 20 will be regarded as 20*1. Below we have to add whole numbers to fractions.
|
Algebraic Shorthand Description of Ideas: |
|||||
| A unit fraction has the form |
1 |
where N is a whole number. For example 2, 3, 4, 5. ... | |||
| A simple fraction has the form | M N |
= | M * | 1 N |
where both M and N are whole numbers. |
First Example: When we divide each third into four equal parts, we get 3 x 4 = 12 equal parts.
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
_1_ |
_1_ |
_1_ |
_1_ |
|
|
|
|
_1_ 12 |
_1_ 12 |
_1_ 12 |
_1_ 12 |
||||||||||||
So a quarter of a third is a twelfth. In words and shorthand symbols
| 1 4 |
of | 1 3 |
= | _1_ 12 |
where 12=3*4. In shorthand symbols only (replace of by times sign *)
| 1 4 |
* | 1 3 |
= | _1_ 12 |
= | 1 3*4 |
We also see that 4 twelfths is a third from above diagram. In symbols, we may write
| _4_ 12 |
= | 4 | * | _1_ 12 |
= | 1 3 |
Second Example: Dividing a half of a length into three equal parts turns gives 6 = 2*3 equal parts in all. Each part is a sixth.
|
1 |
1 |
||||
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
In words and shorthand symbols
| 1 3 |
of | 1 2 |
= | _1_ 6 |
and with shorthand symbols only
| 1 3 |
* | 1 2 |
= | _1_ 6 |
= | 1 3*2 |
Here we see
| _3_ 6 |
= | 3 | * | _1_ 6 |
= | 1 2 |
Algebraic Shorthand Description of a Unit Fraction of a Unit Fraction
In general for whole numbers M and N (take M = 5 and N =7 and M*N = 35 on first pass)
1
Nof 1
M= 1
N*Mand
| _N_ N*M |
= | 1 M |
as | N | * | _1_ P |
= | N P |
First Example: Use the following diagram to find a fifth of three quarters:
|
Three Quarters |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Each box is a quarter |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||
| Each box is a fifth of a quarter | ||||||||||||||||||||
Splitting each quarter into five equal parts gives 4*5 equal parts (third row). So each box in the third row is a 20th. Each box in the third row represents a fifth of a quarter.
| 1 5 |
* | 1 4 |
= | _1_ 20 |
= | 1 5*4 |
So a fifth of three quarters should be three times greater than a fifth of quarter. That is we should have
| 1 5 |
* | 3 4 |
= | _3_ 20 |
= | 3 5*4 |
Count the silver boxes in the third row to confirm this.
Second Example: Use the following diagram to find a half of two thirds
| Two thirds |
2 |
|||||
| Each box is a third | 1 3 |
1 3 |
1 3 |
|||
| Each box is half of a third. | 1 6 |
1 6 |
1 6 |
1 6 |
1 6 |
1 6 |
Splitting each third into two equal parts gives 2*3 equal parts (third row). So each box in the third row is a sixth Each box in the third row represents a half of third..
| 1 2 |
* | 1 3 |
= | _1_ 6 |
= | 1 2*3 |
So a half of two thirds should be twice greater than a half a third. That is we should have
| 1 2 |
* | 2 3 |
= | _2_ 6 |
= | 2 2*3 |
Count the silver boxes in the third row to confirm this. Observe that each third is two sixths. So the answer could also be written as a third. The explanation of equivalent fractions below will go further into matter.
Algebraic Shorthand Description of Unit Fraction of a Simple Fraction
In general for whole numbers M and N (take M = 5 and N =7 and M*N = 35 on first pass)
1
Nof B
M= B
N*Mor with a times symbol * instead of the word of, we write.
1
N* B
M= B
N*MIn the first example above, B = 3, M = 4 and N =5 while in the second example B = 2, M = 3 and N = 2
By definition or convention above, 4 fifths of an object is 4 times a fifth of the object. If the object itself is a simple fraction of another object, we would have 4 fifths of the simple fraction would be 4 times a fifth of the simple fraction. Examples follow.
| 1 4 |
of | 3 10 |
= | 3 4*10 |
So 7 quarters would be seven times the latter.
| 7 4 |
of | 3 10 |
= | 7* | 3 4*10 |
= | 7*3 4*10 |
= | 21 40 |
We may replace the word of by the times symbol * to get
| 7 4 |
* | 3 10 |
= | 7* | 3 4*10 |
= | 7*3 4*10 |
= | 21 40 |
In general, we may compute a simple fraction of a simple fraction as follows:
| A N |
of | B M |
= | A*B N*M |
or with a times symbol * instead of the word of, we write.
| A N |
* | B M |
= | A*B N*M |
In the resulting fraction, the the numerator (top) is a product of the numerators of the factors and the denominator (bottom) is a product of the denominator of the factors.
The foregoing describes the first method for multiplying fractions. After that, we would simplify the resulting fraction by canceling common factors in the products numerator and denominator. The rule here is multiply first and cancel second. But this order can be changed. Cancellation first leads to smaller numbers and a quicker way (usually) to get the simplified form of the product.
A)
| 6 7 |
* | 8 9 |
= | 6*8 7*9 |
= | 48 63 |
B)
| 5 12 |
* | 9 10 |
= | 5*9 12*10 |
= | 45 120 |
= | 9 24 |
C)
| 2 3 |
* | 2 3 |
= | 2*2 3*3 |
= | 4 9 |
Here we are multiplying first and canceling common factors second following the general rule above. But a modification of it is more efficient. See below.
Do you see how the figure
3
42
3suggests or confirms
| 3 4 |
* | 2 3 |
= | 6 12 |
= | 1 2 |
Example:
|
Three Quarters |
3 |
|
||||||
| Each box is a quarter |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||||
| Each box is a half of a quarter | ||||||||
Each quarter is two eighths.. Hence 3 quarters is 6 = 3*2 eighths. Hence
|
3 |
= | 2* 3 2* 4 |
= |
6 |
The foregoing equation may be read forwards or backwards. The fractions
3 and 6
4 8
are equivalent.
A general discussion, an Algebraic Shorthand Description of ideas, follows.
We may use the property of divisible objects (fractions included)
| N | * ( | 1 N |
of an object ) = the object |
Thus if we have a fraction
B
M
of an object then
| N | * ( | 1 N |
of |
B |
of an object | ) = |
B |
of the object |
In shorthand we see
| N | * ( | 1 N |
of |
B |
) | = |
B |
or equivalently
| N | * |
B |
= |
B |
The latter in turn gives the common factor cancellation property
|
N* B |
= |
B |
The left and right hand side in foregoing equation are said to be equivalent fractions. Replacing the left hand side by the right hand side in a calculation is called a simplification, a reduction, a cancellation or a lowering of terms. On the other hand, replacing the right hand side by the left hand side is called raising terms. Raising of terms is useful in the addition and multiplication of fractions.
In the computation of fractions, we may also use
| N | * | _1_ N |
= | 1 |
A centimeter is one hundredth of a metre. So 350 centimeters is 350 one hundredths of a meter.
Now
350 cm = 3* 100 cm +50 cm
So
| 350 | 1 100 |
metres | = | 3*100 | 1 100 |
metres | + | 50 | 1 100 |
metres |
| = |
3 metres |
+ | ½ | metres | ||||||
We may like wise say
| 350 100 |
= |
3*100 + 50 |
= | 3+½ | = | 3½ |
The left hand side fraction is equivalent to a mixed number 3+½ or 3½.
Remark 1 - A hazard:. The notation for mixed numbers is an exception to the rule in algebra that two numbers written side by side indicates a multiplication. Another exception is given by multi-digit decimal notation.
Remark 2 - A quicker way to simplify: Converting an improper fraction (numerator greater than denominator) to a mixed number gives a whole number part and a proper fraction part. The proper fraction has a smaller numerator. The latter may be easier to factor than the original numerator in the improper fraction. So converting to a mixed number may speed the simplification process (lowering terms) for an improper fraction.
Example 1. The question which is greater
|
5 |
or |
3 |
is often answer by comparing 5*4 = 20 with 6*3 =18. Let use look at this in more detail. The least common denominator is 12. The following diagram show both fractions in terms of twenty-fourths: Here 24 = 2* 12
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 5 6 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
Here by putting both fractions over the common denominator 4*6= 24, we see that
|
5 |
= |
20 24 |
is more than | 18 24 |
= |
3 4 |
Therefore
|
5 |
> |
3 |
By putting both fractions over the common denominator, the original comparison can be decided by comparing the over 24 = 4*6 numerators
(i) 20 = 5*4 = (first numerator)*(second denominator)
with
(ii) 18 =6*3 = (first denominator)*(second denominator). These
These over 6*4 = 24 numerators indicate how many (6*4)ths there are in the original fractions.
Example 2: The question which is greater
|
9 |
or |
11 |
This can be answered by seeing how (13*17)ths there are in each fraction. We see that
|
9 |
= |
9*17 13*17 |
= | 153 13*17 |
while | 11 17 |
= |
13*11 13*17 |
= | 143 13*17 |
So the first fraction is greater. It provides more (13*17)ths than the second.
For those of you who insist on knowing, 13*17 =221, a number whose existence we need, but whose value is not required.
Algebraic Shorthand Description of Ideas- the General Case: The key to comparing fractions is to put them over a common denominator.
Read the following with literals (a,b,c,d) = (8, 5, 7, 11) in the first instance. Then let the literals or letters a, b, c and d be any whole number you like.
To compare
|
a |
with |
c |
we put them over a common denominator b*d. (Here we assume b and d are non-negative - why?)
|
a |
= |
a*d b*d |
needs to be compared with | b*c b*d |
= |
c d |
Now we need to compare numerators a*d and b*c.
There are three possibilities:
| (i) if a*d > b*c then |
a |
> |
c |
| (ii) if a*d = b*c then |
a |
= |
c |
| (i) if a*d < b*c then |
a |
< |
c |
The foregoing explains and justifies the so called cross-multiplication rule for the comparison of fractions with non-negative denominators. The product of the denominators b*d gives a common denominator, most likely not the least common, but it will do. The use of the least common denominator is optional in the case of comparison.
Instructors: Students may also compare mixed numbers. The comparison there begins with comparison of the whole number parts. If those parts are equal, comparison then proceeds with the (proper) fraction parts. The cross-multiplication or common denominator method then applies. Note: there is no need to convert the mixed number into an improper fraction.
Instead of counting how much or how is present in terms of whole units we may count in terms of unit fractions.
| 2 3 |
+ | 4 3 |
= | 2+4 3 |
= | 6 3 |
= | 2 |
The foregoing says 2 thirds plus 4 thirds (of a unit of measure) gives six thirds (of the unit of measure) and the latter is equivalent to 2 (of the unit of measure).
| 18 10 |
+ | 15 10 |
= | 18+15 10 |
= | 33 10 |
= | 3 | 3 10 |
since 33 = 3*10+3. The foregoing says 18 tenths plus 15 tenths (of a unit of measure) gives 33 tenths (of the unit of measure) and the latter can be regrouped in to 3 units (as ten tenths equal 1) plus 3 tenths.
| 11 12 |
- | 5 12 |
= | 11-5 12 |
= | 6 12 |
= | 6*1 6*2 |
= | 1 2 |
since 33 = 3*12+3. The foregoing says 11 twelfths minus 5 twelfths is 6 twelfths (of a unit of measure). The latter gives a half. The following diagram attempts to illustrate the subtraction and the fact that 6 twelfths is a half.
|
11 |
|||||||||||
|
6 |
5 |
||||||||||
|
6 |
6 |
||||||||||
Algebraic Shorthand Pattern or Rule for Addition and Subtraction with like denominators
The general pattern or rule for addition in terms of shorthand letters is as follows:
A
N+ B
N= A+B
NFor addition of fractions with the same denominator,
add numerators and keep the denominatorThe general pattern or rule for subtraction in terms of shorthand letters is as follows:
A
N- B
N= A-B
NFor subtract of fractions with the same denominator,
subtract numerators and keep the denominator
What is 2 thirds plus 3 quarters of something.
| 2 3 |
+ | 3 4 |
= | ? |
From
| 2 3 |
= | 8 12 |
and | 3 4 |
= | 9 12 |
we get
| 2 3 |
+ | 3 4 |
= | 8 12 |
+ | 9 12 |
= | 17 12 |
= | 1 | 5 12 |
Physically, we can do and illustrate the addition.
| 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12 |
24 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |||||||
|
2 or 8 |
3 or 9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 + 3 = 8
+ 9 = 8+9 = 17 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
It is physically possible to take a line segment length of 2 thirds a unit and put it besides a line segment of length of 3 quarters a unit. The total length of the two combined segments will be 1 and 5 twelfths as
| 2 3 |
+ | 3 4 |
= | 8 12 |
+ | 9 12 |
= | 17 12 |
= | 1 | 5 12 |
Remark: Efficient ways to add and multiply remain to be treated. Division of fractions remains too.
Two fractions may be added together using any common denominator. For example, the use of common denominator 12 = 2*6 = 3*4 leads to
| 15 6 |
+ | 7 4 |
= | 30 12 |
+ | 21 12 |
= | 51 12 |
= | 4 | 3 12 |
= | 4 | 1 4 |
the use of common denominator 24 = 4*6 = 6*4 leads to
| 15 6 |
+ | 7 4 |
= | 60 24 |
+ | 42 24 |
= | 102 24 |
= | 4 | 6 24 |
= | 4 | 1 4 |
and use of common denominator 36 = 6*6 = 9*4 leads to
| 15 6 |
+ | 7 4 |
= | 90 36 |
+ | 63 36 |
= | 153 36 |
= | 4 | 9 36 |
= | 4 | 1 4 |
For all three choices of common denominators, the least and other, conversion to a like denominator, addition and simplification all lead to the result 4¼ . But the use of smaller common denominators involves smaller numbers in the computation and hence less simplification work in the end. The use of the least common denominators usually gives the most efficient way to add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators. So try to use the least common denominator.
There is one exception that comes to mind, that occurs when the product of the original denominators in the addends (the fractions being added) gives a power of ten, for example 10, 100, 1000, 10000, and so on. In the latter case, divisibility rules for division by 2, 5 and 10 may lead to easier simplification despite the presence of larger numbers.
In general, we may multiply fractions as follows:.
| A N |
* | B M |
= | A*B N*M |
In the resulting fraction, the the numerator (top) is a product of the numerators of the factors and the denominator (bottom) is a product of the denominator of the factors. The foregoing describes the first method for multiplying fractions. After that, we would simplify the resulting fraction by canceling common factors in the products numerator and denominator. The rule here is multiply first and cancel second. But this order can be changed. Cancellation first leads to smaller numbers and a quicker way (usually) to get the simplified form of the product.
Example:
| 25 33 |
* | 44 75 |
= | 25*44 33*75 |
Now instead of compute the products of the numerators and denominators (and
then factoring the products to cancel common factors), we take advantage of the
situation that the original numerators and denominators provide factors of the
product numerators, and factor further to locate common factors that will
cancel. Cancelled factors are crossed-out.
| 25 33 |
* | 44 75 |
= | 25*44 33*75 |
= | 3* |
= | 4 3*3 |
= | 4 9 |
Here we kept the original numerators and denominators and then factored them in a way that would help simplifcation (lowering terms) in the product fraction. So we cancelled the 25 and 11 after factorization. Then after no further factors could be cancelled, computed the decimal representation of the product numerator and denominator in reduced form.
Here is the above product computation revisited with in place cancellation - the same calculation with a cosmetic change.
| 25 33 |
* | 44 75 |
= | 3* |
* | 4* 3* |
= | 1 3 |
* | 4 3 |
= | 4 9 |
The first way we did the cancellation (that is, multiplying the fractions together and then factoring to reduce) provides justification for the cancellation of common factors in the original fractions before multiplication is done.
Algebraic Shorthand Description (rather complicated, can be ignored. None the less, the challenge is to understand what is says or suggests, good luck).
| A*B C*D |
* | D*E B*F |
= | A* C* |
* | = | A C |
* | E F |
The following diagram indicates that the fraction ¾ goes into 3½ units, 4 full times with ½ left over. The ½ is two-thirds of ¾.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 3½ | 4 | 5 |
|
3½ |
|||||||||||||||||||
We see that
| 4 | 2 3 |
* | 3 4 |
= | 3+ | 2 3 |
* | 3 4 |
= | 3+ | 2 4 |
= | 3½ |
So we put
| 3½ ¾ | = | 4 | 2 3 |
We say 3½ divided by ¾ is
| 4 | 2 3 |
We also say 3½ is ¾ is of
| 4 | 2 3 |
Algebraic Shorthand Description of Ideas
Since I do not have a division symbol, I will write "divided by" instead. Now in general, we say| M N |
divided by | A B |
= | T |
when and only when
| T | * | A B |
= | M N |
Here the reciprocal
| T | = | M N |
* | B A |
works.
Check:
| T | * | A B |
= | ( | M N |
* | B A |
) | * | A B |
= | M*B*A N*A*B |
= | M N |
First Example Revisited: How many times does ¾ goes into 3½ = (7/2)?
| Answer: | T | = | 7 2 |
divided by | 3 4 |
= | 7 2 |
* | 4 3 |
= | 7 1 |
* | 2 3 |
= | 4 | 2 3 |
as before |
Our conclusion is that division by a fraction is computed by multiplying by its reciprocal.
Another Examples:
| 13 8 |
divided by | 39 16 |
= | 13 8 |
* | 16 39 |
= | * | 2* 3* |
= | 2 3 |
Check:
| 2 3 |
* | 39 16 |
= | 3 |
* | = | 13 8 |
The foregoing says (13/8) is exactly (2/3)rds of (39/16).
One More Example:
| 8 5 |
divided by | 16 45 |
= | 8 5 |
* | 45 16 |
= | * | 9* 2* |
= | 9 2 |
= | 4½ |
Check:
| 4½ | times | 16 45 |
= | 9 2 |
* | 16 45 |
= | * | = | 8 5 |
Remember: division by a fraction is computed by multiplying by its reciprocal.
Area Content Summary
Hint: See site area on solving linear equations to strengthen fraction sense and algebra skills together. Good luck. |
|
[Top] Favourite Sites: BBC
News and mathematics portion of English
National Curriculum All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Copyright to comments & contributions are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1995 onward by site author Alan Selby, 1983 McGill Ph. D. in maths, All Rights Reserved. |