www.whyslopes.com   << Français :  20 pages >>    
Appetizers and Lessons for Mathematics and Reason
  online logic chapters  - the best starting point for further site exploration.  Bon Appetite.

E. Limits, Properties
Back ] Section Entrance ] Next ]
Section Entrance ]

the Real Analysis appendices of

Why Slopes
and
More Math

Volume 3

Printed in Canada
ISBN 0-9697564-3-7

These  Real Analysis appendices continue the decimal viewpoint of limits, continuity and convergence in chapter 14. and this further lesson

A. What's Next
B. Pigeon Hole Principle
B. Bolzano-Weierstrass
C1. Triangle Inequality
C2. Triangle Inequality
C. More T.Inequality
D. Sets & Sequences
D. Monotone Sequences
E. Limits,  Properties
E Limits & Error Control
F. Continuous Functions
F. Closed Range Thm
F. Intermediate Val. Thm
F. Compactness Thm
F. Equicontinuity Thm
F Extreme Value Thm
G. Rolle's Theorem etc
G. Mean Val. Thm.
G. Constant Difference Thm
G. Lipschitz Continuity I
PS: One Sided Range Theorems
G. Velocity Revisited
G. Sufficient Conditions
H. Riemann Sums Conv
H. Lipschitz Continuity II

Proofs of  one-sided theorems could be of interest in the study of 2D topology.

Algebraic Properties of Limits

The above inequalities have the following consequences. 

Theorem E.2 [Algebraic Properties of Limits] Assume 

lim
x->  a 
f(x) = L    and   
lim
x->  a 
g(x) = M.
where L and M are real numbers. Also assume k > 0 is a real number. Then 

lim
x->  a 
f(x)+g(x)
=
L+M

lim
x->  a 
f(x)g(x)
=
LM

lim
x->  a 
k·f(x)
=
kL
Moreover if M ¹ 0 then 
lim
x->  a 
f(x)
g(x)
=
L
M
lim
x->  a 
1
g(x)
=
1
M


The demonstrations of the first two conclusions are given below. Demonstrations of the last two conclusions are omitted. They are similar. All the demonstrations, given or not, depend on error control inequalities.

Proof of the First Conclusion.

Observe 
|f(x)+g(x)-(L+M)|
=
|f(x)-L+(g(x)-M)|
£
|f(x)-L|+|g(x)-M|
Suppose e > 0. There exists d1 > 0 such that |x-a| < d1 implies |f(x)-L| £ [1/2]e = e1. Similarly, for the same e > 0, there exists d2 > 0 such that |x-a| < d2 implies |g(x)-M| £ [1/2]e = e2. Now put d = min(d1,d2). Then |x-a| £ d implies both |f(x)-L| £ [1/2]e = e1 and |g(x)-M| £ [1/2]e = e2. The latter imply that
|f(x)+g(x)-L+M| £ |f(x)-L|+|g(x)-M|
£ e1+e2 = [1/2]e+[1/2]e = e. Since e > 0 is arbitrary, the foregoing implies

lim
x->  a 
f(x)+g(x) = L+M

Proof of the Second Conclusion.

Suppose e > 0. Recall from the inequality theorem that
|CD-cd| £ |C|e2+|D|e1+e1e2
if |c-C| £ e1 and |d-D| £ e2.

Therefore
|LM-f(x)g(x)| £ |L|e2+|M|e1+e1e2
if |f(x)-L| £ e1 and |g(x)-M| £ e2. Now if e2 and e1 are selected so that the first inequalities
1
3
e
>
|L|e2
1
3
e
>
|M|e1        and
1
3
e
>
e1e2
hold then
|LM-f(x)g(x)| £ e.
Now to satisfy the first inequalities, do the following.

  1. Put e2 = min(1,e[1/(|L|)]) if L ¹ 0 and put e2 = 1 if L = 0. These choices imply the first inequality [1/3]e ³ e|L|e2 and also 0 < e2 £ 1
  2. Put e1 = [1/3]min(e,e[1/(|M|)]) if L ¹ 0 and put e2 = [1/3] if M = 0. These choices imply the remaining two inequalities [1/3]e ³ |M|e2 and [1/3]e ³ ee2 since e2 £ 1.
Note these choices of e1 and e2 are ad hoc, but they work. Other selections could work as well.

Now due to the hypotheses and the definition of limits, there exists d1 > 0 such that |x-a| < d1 implies |f(x)-L| £ e1. Similarly, there exists d2 > 0 such that |x-a| £ d2 implies |g(x)-M| £ e2. Now put d = min(d1,d2). Then |x-a| £ d implies both |f(x)-L| £ e1 and |g(x)-M| £ e2. The latter imply that |LM-f(x)g(x)| < e by the above reasoning. Since e > 0 is arbitrary, we are done.

 

www.whyslopes.com

site search

Parents: Help your Child/Teen Learn covers  Speaking Skills, Reading & Writing Preparing for Science Having Patience, etc

Math How-TOs
1. Arithmetic   2. Algebra   3.  More Algebra  4.  Geometry 5 More Geometry 6.  Calculus
>> densely written 
>> use as skill checklists

Online Volumes (orders)
1,  Elements of Reason. 1996
1A. Pattern Based Reason  1995
1B. Math Curriculum Notes 1996
2. Three Skills for Algebra  1995
3 .Why.Slopes.&
.More.Math.1995

Skill & Concept 
Review or  Development 

 1. Decimal Arith - Video Based ]
2   Fractions  
3.  Fractions  with Units  
3. Solving Linear Equations  - 
making alg easier
4. Formulas forwards & Backwards - unifying theme for Algebra
5.  Proportionality, Back- & For-wards - theme at work.
6.  Logic - Math Free, good for precision in  work & studies 
7. Euclidean-Geometry  (leanly)
8. Slopes and Lines 
9. Why Study Slopes - a context 
10.  Quadratics
11  Polynomials
12  Factored Polys - a context
13 Functions - For-& Back -wards
14  Number Theory, Richly
15. Exponents, Radicals & logs.  
16   Calculus - Examples & Advice 
17.   Real  Analysis 
18  Electric Circuits Etc (So So)
19 Maps, Similarity & Trig, (alt view)
20 Complex numbers  

21 Logic with Symbols+truth tables

22  Consistent Story Telling
23. Even More Logic

 Back ] Up ] Next ] [Top of this Page]  
  www.whyslopes.com?

Road Safety Message  Do not walk on a road with your back to the traffic - rule of thumb
Please report by
email,  errors in mathematics or grammar or terminology to site author
If a mathematics topic you need is not covered in site pages,  report that as well. Topics in most demand
will be covered first in site growth.  

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Copyright to comments & contributions are owned by the Poster. 
The Rest © 1995 onward by site author,   Alan Selby
,  All Rights Reserved.