|
YOU are better than YOU think. Show yourself how:
|
-/[]\- Logic chapters 1 to 5 re- appear not in sequence, as is or longer, in Volume 1A, Pattern Based Reason, Bon Appetite. Logic
Mastery Logic mastery makes the hard, easier. Logic mastery leads to better, stronger and richer comprehension. Logic mastery improves reading and writing. Logic mastery ease learning difficulties. Logic mastery gives a headstart. In sum, logic mastery will develops critical thinking, improve reading and writing, and give a firmer base for work and studies at many levels. Good luck. After logic, (a) continue reading Three Skills for Algebra, chapters 8 to 14 and do so alongside site area on solving liinear Equations ; or (b) see this calculus starter lesson and Volume 3, Why Slopes & More Math, chapters 2 to 6;
|
-/[]\- What may be learnt and when depends on how skills and concepts are developed. Making the hard easier and clearer will allow earlier & richer development of skills and concepts. Try the Twiddla
Whiteboard. In principle, it allows
to people to draw and chat together online on a copy of this webpage or a clean
sheet. The chat may be via text or audio. Visit www.twiddla.com
to set up whiteboards to work with the webpage of your choice. |
Vertical Line Rule and Method
[A set of points] In the above diagram, we see each vertical line touches the drawn set or curve at most once. This gives us the computation rule: for each real number x for which the vertical line through x has a unique intersection (x,y), we put f(x) = y and then write y = f(x). Failure of the Vertical Line Rule and Method
For the above diagram, for some values of x, the vertical line through x meets the set S of points at more than one point (x,y). That is there are several values of y and not a unique value for which (x,y) belongs to the set. So for this set S, we can not use a vertical line to find a unique y given x. Thus no computation rule for y given x can be defined. But if we know (x,y) belongs to S, we can say that y belongs to the vertical line with horizontal coordinate x. That relates or links the value of y to the value of x. The Set Viewpoint
Relation: Suppose A and B are sets of objects (numbers, points in the plane, etc).. Suppose F is a subset of the product set
Then F is called a relation. In other words, any set of order pairs is called a relation. Now suppose F is a relation. If we say (x,y) belong to S then y must belong to the set F(x) = { (x,b) in A x B | (x,b) belongs to S} If the latter set has only one value (or none) for all x in A, we say y is a function y =f (x) of x and the domain of this function is the set of points x for which F(x) consists of only a single point. When F(x) has only a single element, that element is the value of f(x). Remark 1: The equation x = y2 says how to compute x from y. So x = g(y) is a function of y. However, if we graph the set of points x = g(y) = y in the coordinate plane we get a parabola with the x-axis as its axis of symmetry.
When a > 0, the vertical line x = a intersect the curve at two points, namely (a, sqrt(a)) and (a, -sqrt(a)). So the equation x = y2 or a = y2 has two solutions y = sqrt(a) and y = -sqrt(a). Here the equation limits the values of y when x = a, but does not determine the value y. So y is not a function of x. However y is related to x =a (do not think of sets when this word related is used) by the requirement that y = sqrt(x) or y = -sqrt(x). Before set theory, two real variables x and y were related if they were required to satisfy an equation. With the advent of set theory, the solution set of an equation gives a set of ordered pairs in the plane. The set theory codification of what is a relation keeps the set of ordered pairs in the plane but does not require that set be the solution set of an equation. Remark 2. The equation y = x2 says how to compute y from x. So x = g(y) is a function of y.
For all real numbers a, the vertical line x = a has only when intersection point (x,y) = (a, a2) with the set of order pairs in the graph of . So that set of ordered pairs is not only a relation in the set-theoretic sense between x and y, it is also a relation F which satisfies the vertical line property. So if the equation y = x2 was forgotten or not available for computation, we could still in principle use the above graph and the vertical line rule (method?) to find y from x. |
|
|
|